PHD adds gripper options, transition plate to product line

PHD adds gripper options, transition plate to product line

PneuConnect with GRT gripper on a UR cobot. Source: PHD

PHD Inc. this month added three products to its line of grippers and accessories for industrial automation. They are intended to help robots grip large objects, make positioning and programming easy for maximum efficiency, and facilitate machine tending. PHD’s products are designed to work with collaborative robot arms, or cobots, from Universal Robots A/S.

Fort Wayne, In.-based PHD said it sells grippers, linear slides, and the widest range of long-life, robust actuators in the industry. It also offers engineering software and Internet-based tools to save design time, support from factory-trained application and industry specialists, and rapid product delivery.

PHD adds jaw-travel option to GRR line

The company has added a 300mm (11.81 in.) jaw-travel model of its Series GRR high-capacity pneumatic grippers. These parallel grippers are designed to provide high grip force, five long-jaw travels, and high loads.

Because the Guardian grippers can withstand high impact and shock loads, they are suitable for applications such as small engine block manufacturing, automotive wheel-rim manufacturing, and foundry applications, said PHD.

Also available is the Series EGRR high-capacity electric parallel grippers, which offer many of the same benefits as the pneumatic design.

Pneu-Connect X2 with dual grippers available

PHD also announced the release of Pneu-Connext X2 kits with dual grippers. They can be mounted to UR cobots for maximum efficiency in automation performance.

The Pneu-Connect X2 includes PHD’s Freedrive feature, which interfaces with UR cobots for easy positioning and programming. The kits come in the following standard combinations:

Contact PHD for other gripper combinations.

The Pneu-Connect® X2 includes the following features, said PHD:

  • Five popular PHD pneumatic gripper options for a wide variety of applications
  • Two grippers for maximum automation efficiency
  • Series GRH Grippers now offer analog sensors providing jaw position feedback throughout jaw travel
  • The Freedrive feature that interfaces with the UR for easy positioning and programming
  • Seamless, cost-effective, end-effector integration
  • Incorporated MAC valves and control board
  • Common jaw mounting for application specific tooling
  • Updated URCap software included for intuitive, easy setup
  • Ease of use

Download the Pneu-Connect catalog for more information.

Transition plates connect UR directly to linear actuator

PHD’s transition plate allows a Universal Robot arm to be directly attached to the new PHD Series ESU electric belt-driven linear actuator. The company said it offers a transition plate for each size of UR arm, “taking machine tending to a whole new level.”

PHD transition plate

This transition plate provides a seventh axis for UR arms with the ESU linear actuator. Source: PHD

With a cataloged stroke of up to 5500mm (216.53 in.), users can increase the working area of a UR10 arm by 10 times.

The post PHD adds gripper options, transition plate to product line appeared first on The Robot Report.

6 common step motor mistakes to avoid in automation applications

6 common step motor mistakes to avoid in automation applications

Step motors and drives from Applied Motion Products

The mistakes outlined here by Eric Rice, national marketing director at Applied Motion Products, have been corrected countless times by thousands of step motor users around the world. Avoid these mistakes with the presented solutions — and make your next application a successful one.

Step motors offer the automation industry a cost-effective and simple method to digitally control motion in a wide range of applications — including packaging equipment, 3D printers, material handling and sorting lines, bench-top CNC machines, and more. They serve as critical components of many rotary and linear positioning axes.

The cost-performance benefits of step motors lie in their simplicity and their ability to position accurately in open-loop control schemes, without any feedback from the motor to the controller. Getting the optimal performance benefits of an open-loop stepper system requires understanding how to specify and install a step motor into an application. Following are six common mistakes that step motor users, both novice and experienced, can easily avoid.

1. ‘The torque spec of the motor is higher than what I’m seeing in practice.’

After calculating the torque required to move the load in an application, a user selects a step motor based on (1) the holding torque specification of the motor or (2) the speed-torque curve. Once mounted and coupled to the load, the motor doesn’t produce the amount of expected torque.

The first mistake is using the holding torque as a measure of performance to specify the step motor. Holding torque defines the torque a motor produces when maintaining a position and not moving. It is generally a poor indicator of the torque the motor produces when moving.

When a step motor starts moving, the produced torque falls precipitously from the holding torque value, even after just a few rpms. As speed increases, the torque falls further. For this reason, don’t select a motor based on holding torque alone. Instead, refer to published speed-torque curves.

step motors from Applied Motion Products with various stack lengths

Shown here are step motors from Applied Motion Products with various stack lengths.

The second mistake is failing to understand the nature of speed-torque curves. A speed-torque curve represents the torque at which the step motor stalls. When a motor stalls, the rotor loses synchronization with the stator, and the shaft stops turning.

To ensure the step motor continues to turn and provides enough torque to move the load, evaluate the speed-torque curves by estimating a margin of safety. A simple way to do this is by imagining a line parallel to the speed-torque curve at roughly 1/2 to 2/3 the height of the published curve. This imaginary line represents an amount of torque that a step motor can reliably produce with minimal risk of stalling. See Figure 1 below for more on this.

typical speed-torque curve of a step motor

Figure 1 — typical speed-torque curve of a step motor. In published data from the manufacturer, only the solid line is shown, which indicates stall torque versus speed. The user must estimate a usable torque range as shown by the dashed line.

2. ‘The step motor is so hot; there must be something wrong with it.’

Step motors are designed to run hot. The most common insulation class used in step motors is Class B, which is rated for operation up to 130° C. This means that the surface temperature of a step motor can reach 90° C or more before failing. This temperature is much hotter than a person could touch without burning the skin. For this reason, mount motors away from areas with a high chance of human contact.

Step motors are designed to run at high temperatures because of their use in open-loop control systems. Because an open-loop step motor operates without any current feedback (or velocity or position feedback), the current supplied by the drive is constant, regardless of the torque demand.

To get the most torque from step motors, manufacturers specify them with the Class B insulation in mind; so, current ratings are designed to maximize torque output without overheating. The end result is that step motors produce a lot of torque … but they also get quite hot in doing so.

3. ‘Can I use a 12V power supply to power my motor and drive?’

For any kind of electric motor, not just step motors, the supply voltage is directly related to motor speed. As higher voltages are supplied to the system, the motor achieves higher speeds. The rated supply voltage specified for servo and DC motors correspond to other rated specifications including speed, torque, and power.

If a step motor is specified with a rated voltage, it is typically no more than the motor’s winding resistance times the rated current. This is useful for producing holding torque but of very little use when the step motor moves.

Like all electric motors, when the shaft starts moving, the step motor produces a back EMF (BEMF) voltage that impedes the current flowing into the windings. To produce usable torque, the supply voltage must be substantially higher than the BEMF. Because no hard and fast rules exist for how high to specify the supply voltage, users should review the published speed-torque curves for a given step motor, drive, and power supply combination.

The supply voltage specified in the speed-torque curve is essential information. If ignored, say by using a 12-V supply when the published curve uses a 48-V supply, the motor won’t reach the expected torque. See Figure 2 below.

Figure 2 — two speed-torque curves of the same step motor and drive combination. Only the power supply voltage is different. The dark green line shows stall torque with a 48-V power supply. The light green line shows stall torque with a 24-V supply. A 12-V supply would spur an even lower curve.

4. ‘Can’t I run this step motor with a couple of PLC outputs? Why do a need a drive?’

Two-phase stepper drives use a set of eight transistors connected to form an H-bridge. Creating an equivalent H-bridge from PLC outputs would require eight outputs. Some two-phase step motors with six lead wires are driven with as few as four transistors. For these, you could use four PLC outputs to rotate a step motor forward and backward. However, a stepper drive does much more than simply sequence the transistors in the H-bridge.

Stepper drives regulate the current in each phase of the motor using PWM switching of the bus voltage. As noted in the previous section on voltage, the supply voltage must be high enough to overcome BEMF and produce torque at speed.

Stepper drives with microstepping capabilities further refine the PWM switching logic to ratio the current in each phase according to a sine wave, getting finer positioning than a step motor’s basic step angle. Moving beyond the most basic stepper drives, those that have trajectory generators on board can automatically ramp the motor speed up and down according to preset acceleration and deceleration rates.

Using PLC outputs to drive a step motor could be a neat project for someone interested in dissecting how step motors work. For any serious motion-control project, you’ll want a proper drive.

5. ‘The motor is so noisy … there must be something wrong with it.’

Every time a step motor takes a step, it generates a little bit of ringing noise as the rotor settles into position (think of the classic mass on a spring). The ringing is the motor’s natural resonant frequency, which is based on the motor construction. The natural resonant frequency is amplified when the frequency of motor steps approaches or equals it.

This noise is most pronounced when the step motor is driven in full step sequence (the lowest resolution available; equal to the motor’s step angle) and at low speeds, typically in the range of 1 to 5 revolutions per second.

The question of noise most often arises when a user tests a step motor for the first time with the motor unmounted and uncoupled to any load. In this scenario, the motor is free to resonate as much as it likes without anything to damp the resonance.

Fortunately, a few easy steps can mitigate the resonance:

  • Add mechanical damping to the system by mounting the motor and coupling the motor shaft to a load. Coupling the shaft to a load adds some amount of inertia or friction to the system … and that in turn alters or damps the motor’s natural resonant frequency.
  • Reduce the step angle with microstepping. When microstepping, the step angle is much smaller with each step and the natural resonant frequency is excited less.

If neither of these steps works, consider using a stepper drive with an anti-resonance algorithm built into its current control logic.

6. ‘I need an encoder to run a step motor, right?’

No, an encoder is not required to run a step motor in open-loop control. Step motors are the only type of brushless DC motor that accurately and repeatedly position a load using open-loop control. Other motors need some type of position feedback. Open-loop control works well when:

  • Motion tasks are the same over time.
  • The load doesn’t change.
  • The required speeds are relatively low.
  • Failure to complete the motion task does not result in critical or dangerous machine failure.

If the application doesn’t meet the stated criteria, consider introducing feedback into the system to permit some level of closed-loop control. Adding an encoder to a step motor system offers benefits ranging from basic functions that are essentially open-loop control but with subtle, effective improvements, to fully closed-loop control where the step motor operates as part of a servo control system. Contact your step motor and drive supplier for information on the range of feedback and closed-loop control options they offer.

Applied Motion Products step motors come in a wide range of frame sizes — from NEMA 8 to NEMA 42 and beyond.

Editor’s note: This article originally ran on Design World, a sibling site of The Robot Report.

The post 6 common step motor mistakes to avoid in automation applications appeared first on The Robot Report.

Artificial muscles based on MIT fibers could make robots more responsive

Artificial muscles from MIT achieve powerful pulling force

Artificial muscles based on powerful fiber contractions could advance robotics and prosthetics. Credit: Felice Frankel

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — As a cucumber plant grows, it sprouts tightly coiled tendrils that seek out supports in order to pull the plant upward. This ensures the plant receives as much sunlight exposure as possible. Now, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have found a way to imitate this coiling-and-pulling mechanism to produce contracting fibers that could be used as artificial muscles for robots, prosthetic limbs, or other mechanical and biomedical applications.

While many different approaches have been used for creating artificial muscles, including hydraulic systems, servo motors, shape-memory metals, and polymers that respond to stimuli, they all have limitations, including high weight or slow response times. The new fiber-based system, by contrast, is extremely lightweight and can respond very quickly, the researchers say. The findings are being reported today in the journal Science.

The new fibers were developed by MIT postdoc Mehmet Kanik and graduate student Sirma Örgüç, working with professors Polina Anikeeva, Yoel Fink, Anantha Chandrakasan, and C. Cem Taşan. The team also included MIT graduate student Georgios Varnavides, postdoc Jinwoo Kim, and undergraduate students Thomas Benavides, Dani Gonzalez, and Timothy Akintlio. They have used a fiber-drawing technique to combine two dissimilar polymers into a single strand of fiber.

artificial muscle fiber at MIT

Credit: Courtesy of the researchers, MIT

The key to the process is mating together two materials that have very different thermal expansion coefficients — meaning they have different rates of expansion when they are heated. This is the same principle used in many thermostats, for example, using a bimetallic strip as a way of measuring temperature. As the joined material heats up, the side that wants to expand faster is held back by the other material. As a result, the bonded material curls up, bending toward the side that is expanding more slowly.

Using two different polymers bonded together, a very stretchable cyclic copolymer elastomer and a much stiffer thermoplastic polyethylene, Kanik, Örgüç and colleagues produced a fiber that, when stretched out to several times its original length, naturally forms itself into a tight coil, very similar to the tendrils that cucumbers produce.

Artificial muscles surprise

But what happened next actually came as a surprise when the researchers first experienced it. “There was a lot of serendipity in this,” Anikeeva recalled.

As soon as Kanik picked up the coiled fiber for the first time, the warmth of his hand alone caused the fiber to curl up more tightly. Following up on that observation, he found that even a small increase in temperature could make the coil tighten up, producing a surprisingly strong pulling force. Then, as soon as the temperature went back down, the fiber returned to its original length.

In later testing, the team showed that this process of contracting and expanding could be repeated 10,000 times “and it was still going strong,” Anikeeva said.

One of the reasons for that longevity, she said, is that “everything is operating under very moderate conditions,” including low activation temperatures. Just a 1-degree Celsius increase can be enough to start the fiber contraction.

The fibers can span a wide range of sizes, from a few micrometers (millionths of a meter) to a few millimeters (thousandths of a meter) in width, and can easily be manufactured in batches up to hundreds of meters long. Tests have shown that a single fiber is capable of lifting loads of up to 650 times its own weight. For these experiments on individual fibers, Örgüç and Kanik have developed dedicated, miniaturized testing setups.

artificial muscle fiber test

Credit: Courtesy of the researchers, MIT

The degree of tightening that occurs when the fiber is heated can be “programmed” by determining how much of an initial stretch to give the fiber. This allows the material to be tuned to exactly the amount of force needed and the amount of temperature change needed to trigger that force.

The fibers are made using a fiber-drawing system, which makes it possible to incorporate other components into the fiber itself. Fiber drawing is done by creating an oversized version of the material, called a preform, which is then heated to a specific temperature at which the material becomes viscous. It can then be pulled, much like pulling taffy, to create a fiber that retains its internal structure but is a small fraction of the width of the preform.

For testing purposes, the researchers coated the fibers with meshes of conductive nanowires. These meshes can be used as sensors to reveal the exact tension experienced or exerted by the fiber. In the future, these fibers could also include heating elements such as optical fibers or electrodes, providing a way of heating it internally without having to rely on any outside heat source to activate the contraction of the “muscle.”

Potential applications

Such artificial muscle fibers could find uses as actuators in robotic arms, legs, or grippers, and in prosthetic limbs, where their slight weight and fast response times could provide a significant advantage.

Some prosthetic limbs today can weigh as much as 30 pounds, with much of the weight coming from actuators, which are often pneumatic or hydraulic; lighter-weight actuators could thus make life much easier for those who use prosthetics.

Credit: Courtesy of the researchers, MIT

“Such fibers might also find uses in tiny biomedical devices, such as a medical robot that works by going into an artery and then being activated,” Anikeeva said. “We have activation times on the order of tens of milliseconds to seconds,” depending on the dimensions.

To provide greater strength for lifting heavier loads, the fibers can be bundled together, much as muscle fibers are bundled in the body. The team successfully tested bundles of 100 fibers.

Through the fiber-drawing process, sensors could also be incorporated in the fibers to provide feedback on conditions they encounter, such as in a prosthetic limb. Örgüç said bundled muscle fibers with a closed-loop feedback mechanism could find applications in robotic systems where automated and precise control are required.

Kanik said that the possibilities for materials of this type are virtually limitless, because almost any combination of two materials with different thermal expansion rates could work, leaving a vast realm of possible combinations to explore. He added that this new finding was like opening a new window, only to see “a bunch of other windows” waiting to be opened.

“The strength of this work is coming from its simplicity,” he said.

The work was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the National Science Foundation.

Editor’s note: This article republished with permission from MIT News. 

The post Artificial muscles based on MIT fibers could make robots more responsive appeared first on The Robot Report.

Automated system from MIT generates robotic actuators for novel tasks

An automated system developed by MIT researchers designs and 3D prints complex robotic parts called actuators that are optimized according to an enormous number of specifications.

An automated system developed by MIT researchers designs and 3D prints complex robotic parts called actuators that are optimized according to an enormous number of specifications. Credit: Subramanian Sundaram

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — An automated system developed by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology designs and 3D prints complex robotic actuators that are optimized according to an enormous number of specifications. In short, the system does automatically what is virtually impossible for humans to do by hand.

In a paper published in Science Advances, the researchers demonstrated the system by fabricating actuators that show different black-and-white images at different angles. One actuator, for instance, portrays a Vincent van Gogh portrait when laid flat. When it’s activated, it tilts at an angle and displays the famous Edvard Munch painting “The Scream.”

The actuators are made from a patchwork of three different materials, each with a different light or dark color and a property — such as flexibility and magnetization — that controls the actuator’s angle in response to a control signal. Software first breaks down the actuator design into millions of three-dimensional pixels, or “voxels,” that can each be filled with any of the materials.

Then, it runs millions of simulations, filling different voxels with different materials. Eventually, it lands on the optimal placement of each material in each voxel to generate two different images at two different angles. A custom 3D printer then fabricates the actuator by dropping the right material into the right voxel, layer by layer.

“Our ultimate goal is to automatically find an optimal design for any problem, and then use the output of our optimized design to fabricate it,” said first author Subramanian Sundaram, Ph.D. ’18, a former graduate student in MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). “We go from selecting the printing materials, to finding the optimal design, to fabricating the final product in almost a completely automated way.”

New robotic actuators mimic biology for efficiency

The shifting images demonstrates what the system can do. But actuators optimized for appearance and function could also be used for biomimicry in robotics. For instance, other researchers are designing underwater robotic skins with actuator arrays meant to mimic denticles on shark skin. Denticles collectively deform to decrease drag for faster, quieter swimming.

“You can imagine underwater robots having whole arrays of actuators coating the surface of their skins, which can be optimized for drag and turning efficiently, and so on,” Sundaram said.

Joining Sundaram on the paper were Melina Skouras, a former MIT postdoc; David S. Kim, a former researcher in the Computational Fabrication Group; Louise van den Heuvel ’14, SM ’16; and Wojciech Matusik, an MIT associate professor in electrical engineering and computer science and head of the Computational Fabrication Group.

Navigating the ‘combinatorial explosion’

Robotic actuators are becoming increasingly complex. Depending on the application, they must be optimized for weight, efficiency, appearance, flexibility, power consumption, and various other functions and performance metrics. Generally, experts manually calculate all those parameters to find an optimal design.

Adding to that complexity, new 3D-printing techniques can now use multiple materials to create one product. That means the design’s dimensionality becomes incredibly high

“What you’re left with is what’s called a ‘combinatorial explosion,’ where you essentially have so many combinations of materials and properties that you don’t have a chance to evaluate every combination to create an optimal structure,” Sundaram said.

The researchers first customized three polymer materials with specific properties they needed to build their robotic actuators: color, magnetization, and rigidity. They ultimately produced a near-transparent rigid material, an opaque flexible material used as a hinge, and a brown nanoparticle material that responds to a magnetic signal. They plugged all that characterization data into a property library.

The system takes as input grayscale image examples — such as the flat actuator that displays the Van Gogh portrait but tilts at an exact angle to show “The Scream.” It basically executes a complex form of trial and error that’s somewhat like rearranging a Rubik’s Cube, but in this case around 5.5 million voxels are iteratively reconfigured to match an image and meet a measured angle.

Initially, the system draws from the property library to randomly assign different materials to different voxels. Then, it runs a simulation to see if that arrangement portrays the two target images, straight on and at an angle. If not, it gets an error signal. That signal lets it know which voxels are on the mark and which should be changed.

Adding, removing, and shifting around brown magnetic voxels, for instance, will change the actuator’s angle when a magnetic field is applied. But, the system also has to consider how aligning those brown voxels will affect the image.

MIT robotic actuator

Credit: Subramanian Sundaram

Voxel by voxel

To compute the actuator’s appearances at each iteration, the researchers adopted a computer graphics technique called “ray-tracing,” which simulates the path of light interacting with objects. Simulated light beams shoot through the actuator at each column of voxels.

Actuators can be fabricated with more than 100 voxel layers. Columns can contain more than 100 voxels, with different sequences of the materials that radiate a different shade of gray when flat or at an angle.

When the actuator is flat, for instance, the light beam may shine down on a column containing many brown voxels, producing a dark tone. But when the actuator tilts, the beam will shine on misaligned voxels. Brown voxels may shift away from the beam, while more clear voxels may shift into the beam, producing a lighter tone.

The system uses that technique to align dark and light voxel columns where they need to be in the flat and angled image. After 100 million or more iterations, and anywhere from a few to dozens of hours, the system will find an arrangement that fits the target images.

“We’re comparing what that [voxel column] looks like when it’s flat or when it’s titled, to match the target images,” Sundaram said. “If not, you can swap, say, a clear voxel with a brown one. If that’s an improvement, we keep this new suggestion and make other changes over and over again.”

To fabricate the actuators, the researchers built a custom 3-D printer that uses a technique called “drop-on-demand.” Tubs of the three materials are connected to print heads with hundreds of nozzles that can be individually controlled. The printer fires a 30-micron-sized droplet of the designated material into its respective voxel location. Once the droplet lands on the substrate, it’s solidified. In that way, the printer builds an object, layer by layer.

The work could be used as a stepping stone for designing larger structures, such as airplane wings, Sundaram says. Researchers, for instance, have similarly started breaking down airplane wings into smaller voxel-like blocks to optimize their designs for weight and lift, and other metrics.

“We’re not yet able to print wings or anything on that scale, or with those materials,” said Sundaram. “But I think this is a first step toward that goal.”

Editor’s note: This article republished with permission from MIT News.

The post Automated system from MIT generates robotic actuators for novel tasks appeared first on The Robot Report.

R-Series actuator from Hebi Robotics is ready for outdoor rigors

PITTSBURGH — What do both summer vacationers and field robots need to do? Get into the water. Hebi Robotics this week announced the availability of its R-Series actuators, which it said can enable engineers “to quickly create custom robots that can be deployed directly in wet, dirty, or outdoor environments.”

Hebi Robotics was founded in 2014 by Carnegie Mellon University professor and robotics pioneer Howie Choset. It makes hardware and software for developers to build robots for their specific applications. It also offers custom development services to make robots “simple, useful, and safe.”

Hebi’s team includes experts in robotics, particularly in motion control. The company has developed robotics tools for academic, aerospace military, sewer inspection, and spaceflight users.

Robots can get wet and dirty with R-Series actuators

The R-Series actuator is built on Hebi’s X-Series platform. It is sealed to IP678 and is designed to be lightweight, compact, and energy-efficient. The series includes three models, the R8-3, which has continuous torque of 3 N-m and weighs 670g; the RB-9, which has continuous torque of 8 N-m and weighs 685g; and the R8-16, which has continuous torque of 16 N-m and weighs 715g.

Hebi's R-Series actuator

The R-Series actuator is sealed for wet and dirty environments. Source: Hebi Robotics

The actuators also include sensors that Hebi said “enable simultaneous control of position, velocity, and torque, as well as three-axis inertial measurement.”

In addition, the R-Series integrates a brushless motor, gear reduction, force sensing, encoders, and controls in a compact package, said Hebi. The actuators can run on 24-48V DC, include internal pressure sensors, and communicate via 100Mbps Ethernet.

On the software side, the R-Series has application programming interfaces (APIs) for MATLAB, the Robot Operating System (ROS), Python, C and C++, and C#, as well as support for Windows, Linux, and OS X.

According to Hebi Robotics, the R-Series actuators will be available this autumn, and it is accepting pre-orders at 10% off the list prices. The actuator costs $4,500, and kits range from $20,000 to $36,170, depending on the number of degrees of freedom of the robotic arm. Customers should inquire about pricing for the hexapod kit.

The post R-Series actuator from Hebi Robotics is ready for outdoor rigors appeared first on The Robot Report.

MIT ‘walking motor’ could help robots assemble complex structures


Years ago, MIT Professor Neil Gershenfeld had an audacious thought. Struck by the fact that all the world’s living things are built out of combinations of just 20 amino acids, he wondered: Might it be possible to create a kit of just 20 fundamental parts that could be used to assemble all of the different technological products in the world?

Gershenfeld and his students have been making steady progress in that direction ever since. Their latest achievement, presented this week at an international robotics conference, consists of a set of five tiny fundamental parts that can be assembled into a wide variety of functional devices, including a tiny “walking” motor that can move back and forth across a surface or turn the gears of a machine.

Previously, Gershenfeld and his students showed that structures assembled from many small, identical subunits can have numerous mechanical properties. Next, they demonstrated that a combination of rigid and flexible part types can be used to create morphing airplane wings, a longstanding goal in aerospace engineering. Their latest work adds components for movement and logic, and will be presented at the International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS) in Helsinki, Finland, in a paper by Gershenfeld and MIT graduate student Will Langford.

New approach to building robots

Their work offers an alternative to today’s approaches to constructing robots, which largely fall into one of two types: custom machines that work well but are relatively expensive and inflexible, and reconfigurable ones that sacrifice performance for versatility. In the new approach, Langford came up with a set of five millimeter-scale components, all of which can be attached to each other by a standard connector. These parts include the previous rigid and flexible types, along with electromagnetic parts, a coil, and a magnet. In the future, the team plans to make these out of still smaller basic part types.

Using this simple kit of tiny parts, Langford assembled them into a novel kind of motor that moves an appendage in discrete mechanical steps, which can be used to turn a gear wheel, and a mobile form of the motor that turns those steps into locomotion, allowing it to “walk” across a surface in a way that is reminiscent of the molecular motors that move muscles. These parts could also be assembled into hands for gripping, or legs for walking, as needed for a particular task, and then later reassembled as those needs change. Gershenfeld refers to them as “digital materials,” discrete parts that can be reversibly joined, forming a kind of functional micro-LEGO.

The new system is a significant step toward creating a standardized kit of parts that could be used to assemble robots with specific capabilities adapted to a particular task or set of tasks. Such purpose-built robots could then be disassembled and reassembled as needed in a variety of forms, without the need to design and manufacture new robots from scratch for each application.

Robots working in confined spaces

Langford’s initial motor has an ant-like ability to lift seven times its own weight. But if greater forces are required, many of these parts can be added to provide more oomph. Or if the robot needs to move in more complex ways, these parts could be distributed throughout the structure. The size of the building blocks can be chosen to match their application; the team has made nanometer-sized parts to make nanorobots, and meter-sized parts to make megarobots. Previously, specialized techniques were needed at each of these length scale extremes.

“One emerging application is to make tiny robots that can work in confined spaces,” Gershenfeld says. Some of the devices assembled in this project, for example, are smaller than a penny yet can carry out useful tasks.

To build in the “brains,” Langford has added part types that contain millimeter-sized integrated circuits, along with a few other part types to take care of connecting electrical signals in three dimensions.

The simplicity and regularity of these structures makes it relatively easy for their assembly to be automated. To do that, Langford has developed a novel machine that’s like a cross between a 3-D printer and the pick-and-place machines that manufacture electronic circuits, but unlike either of those, this one can produce complete robotic systems directly from digital designs. Gershenfeld says this machine is a first step toward to the project’s ultimate goal of “making an assembler that can assemble itself out of the parts that it’s assembling.”


Editor’s Note: This article was republished from MIT News.


The post MIT ‘walking motor’ could help robots assemble complex structures appeared first on The Robot Report.

Kollmorgen to present advanced motion control for commercial robots at Robotics Summit & Expo

Kollmorgen will exhibit its newest motion-centric automation solutions for designers and manufacturers of commercial robots and intelligent systems at the Robotics Summit & Expo 2019. Visitors are invited to Booth 202 to see and participate in a variety of product exhibits and exciting live demos.

Demos and other exhibits have been designed to show how Kollmorgen’s next-generation technology helps robot designers and manufacturers increase efficiency, uptime, throughput, and machine life.

Demonstrations

The AKM2G Servo Motor delivers the best power and torque density on the market, offering OEMs a way to increase performance and speed while cutting power consumption and costs. Highly configurable, with six frame sizes with up to five stack lengths, and a variety of selectable options (such as feedback, mounting, and performance capabilities), the AKM2G can easily be dropped into existing designs.

Robotic Gearmotor Demo: Discover how Kollmorgen’s award-winning frameless motor solutions integrate seamlessly with strain wave gears, feedback devices, and servo drives to form a lightweight and compact robotic joint solution. Kollmorgen’s standard and custom frameless motor solutions enable smaller, lighter, and faster robots.

AGVs and Mobile Robots: Show attendees can learn about Kollmorgen’s flexible, scalable vehicle control solutions for material handling for smart factories and warehouses with AGVs and mobile robots.

Panel discussion

Kollmorgen's Tom Wood will speak at the Robotics Summit & Expo

Tom Wood, Kollmorgen

Tom Wood, frameless motor product specialist at Kollmorgen, will participate in a session at 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 5, in the “Technology, Tools, and Platforms” track at the Robotics Summit & Expo. He will be part of a panel on “Motion Control and Robotics Opportunities,” which will discuss new and improved technologies. The panel will examine how these motion-control technologies are leading to new robotics capabilities, new applications, and entry into new markets.

Register now for the Robotics Summit & Expo, which will be at Boston’s Seaport World Trade Center on June 5-6.

About Kollmorgen

Since its founding in 1916, Kollmorgen’s innovative solutions have brought big ideas to life, kept the world safer, and improved peoples’ lives. Today, its world-class knowledge of motion systems and components, industry-leading quality, and deep expertise in linking and integrating standard and custom products continually delivers breakthrough motion solutions that are unmatched in performance, reliability, and ease of use. This gives machine builders around the world an irrefutable marketplace advantage and provides their customers with ultimate peace of mind.

For more information about Kollmorgen technologies, please visit www.kollmorgen.com or call 1-540-633-3545.

ADVANCED Motion Controls debuts FlexPro digital servo drives


The FE060-25-EM is the first servo drive of the new FlexPro digital drive family from ADVANCED Motion Controls (AMC). Designed with compact form and power density in mind, the micro-sized FE060-25-EM can outperform larger-sized digital servo drives and still be integrated into tight spaces.

At just 1.5 x 1 x 0.6 in. (38 x 25 x 16 mm) in size, the footprint of the drive is approximately the same as two standard postage stamps. In other words, four of these drives can fit on a standard business card. Even with its small size, the FE060-25-EM can supply brushed, brushless, stepper, and linear servo motors with up to 25 A continuous current and 50 A peak current.

AMC FE060-25-EM Servo Drive

AMC FE060-25-EM Servo Drive

Here are some of the features of the FE060-25-EM servo drive:

  • 10 to 55 Vdc supply voltage
  • Highest power density servo drive from AMC to date
  • EtherCAT Communication
  • Incremental encoder and BISS C-mode feedback
  • Torque, velocity, and position operating modes
  • Configuration and full loop tuning
    IMPACT architecture

IMPACT (Integrated Motion Platform And Control Technology) is the architecture that makes AMC’s FlexPro drives possible. The stacking of circuit boards with creative selection and placement of high-power components allows for much higher power density than previously produced servo drives.

A developer version is available for proof-of-concept and testing purposes – part number FD060-25-EM. It comes with an FE060-25-EM soldered to a larger board equipped with various connectors for simplified interfacing.

The small size of the FE060-25-EM makes well-suited for cobots, AGVs, lab and warehouse automation, military equipment, and any other integrated design.

maxon motor high-performance sensorless control for brushless motors

maxon motor has developed a sensorless speed and torque control solution called High-Performance Sensorless Control (HPSC). This new technology allows FOC (field oriented control) for brushless motors without sensors from full stop to full speed under load. [Related: maxon motor introduces exoskeleton joint actuator] The maxon motor HPSC uses a sophisticated signal injection algorithm which…

The post maxon motor high-performance sensorless control for brushless motors appeared first on The Robot Report.